All IFV lessons
IFV · Lesson 2 of 6 · 6 min read

The three assessment criteria — Innovation, Viability, Scalability

Every IFV decision turns on these three questions. Plain-English explanation of each, what counts as evidence, and the most common rejection patterns.

TL;DR

Every IFV decision turns on three criteria — Innovation, Viability, Scalability. Innovation is what trips up the most applicants. Viability tests whether you and your team can actually deliver. Scalability tests whether the business can grow beyond a lifestyle business. You need all three, not two of three.

Innovation

Is your business genuinely new, viable, and different from offerings currently available in the UK market? This is the criterion most applications fail on.

  • What the gap in the UK market is — be specific about who the existing players are and what they do
  • Why your approach is different — not just "better", but structurally different
  • Evidence of innovation — proprietary tech, novel methodology, distinctive go-to-market, IP, patents
  • Why now — what changed in the market or technology that makes this possible/needed now
Common rejection trap
"Yet another food-delivery app, but with AI" doesn't satisfy Innovation. The endorsing body knows Deliveroo, Uber Eats, Just Eat exist. If your differentiation is "better UX" or "lower commission", that's a feature, not innovation. Real innovation is a different business model, a different market, a different technology — something the existing UK incumbents can't easily copy.

Viability

Can you, specifically, deliver this business plan? Viability tests whether you have the skills, experience, knowledge, and resources to execute.

  • Your background — relevant industry experience, technical depth, or domain expertise
  • Your team — co-founders, advisors, hires planned or in place
  • Market understanding — depth of insight into customer pain, regulation, competition
  • Resources — runway, committed funding, pipeline, technical assets in place
  • Realistic plan — financial projections that don't assume hockey-stick growth without justification
Viability rejection trap
Solo founders with no team and no relevant industry experience attempting to build in a regulated industry (fintech, healthtech). Endorsing bodies want to believe you can pull it off — that means showing them either deep relevant background or a credible team that has it.

Scalability

Can this business grow into something meaningful — creating UK jobs, generating substantial revenue, expanding to new markets — rather than staying a one-person consultancy?

  • Structured planning — clear milestones, hiring plan, market expansion roadmap
  • Growth model — does the business model itself scale? (SaaS / marketplace / platform yes; bespoke services typically harder)
  • UK job creation potential — endorsing bodies favour businesses that will hire UK staff
  • Expansion pathway — domestic scaling first, international later, with logic for each
Quick check

Three criteria — does this profile pass?

I'm building an AI-powered tool that helps UK accountants automate VAT return preparation. My co-founder is an ex-PwC tax partner. We have 3 paid pilot customers.

I want to start a coffee shop chain in London with a beautiful interior design concept.

I'm a solo non-technical founder wanting to build a blockchain-based mortgage platform. No co-founder, no industry background, no MVP.

I run a profitable freelance consulting practice in supply-chain analytics for UK manufacturers. I want to formalise it under the IFV.


Get an expert review

Explore the Innovator Founder readiness check for your business idea.

Check my business idea